5 Myths Busted About Software Security: Understanding Myth and the Bitter Reality!

Today, businesses depend heavily upon software, and so do individuals. The truth is that guaranteeing your business or family’s security is as much about understanding the risks, including technologies to help avoid them. Yet with so much dependency on technologies or applications, why do new vulnerabilities keep cropping up every day? The software security myths that lead many of us assume that they’re in a safe line, though not verifying it completely. So, why software isn’t more protected and why are the threats growing despite adding up-to-date security software? Well, here are few common myths about the software security that businessmen or developers can work on.

Most myths are centered on the development processes that eventually create vulnerabilities. However, it can be resolved by installing a better integrated software security. This process requires a team effort in order to avoid subsequent breaches.

Myth 1 – Anything is an Information Security Related Problem

It is a common myth that anything associated with security should be the direct responsibility of company’s security department. The best security applications should be set up as sub-function throughout the business. The management must install the direction for how venture-wide security practices are prioritized, distinguished, managed, and executed. It has to be viewed just like another factor of software, including reliability, usability, scalability, and performance. Most importantly, it should be considered as a very crucial element in the software development cycle, from the definition to the end, but sadly that’s not the case at the moment.

Myth 2 – Everything is Software Centric!

The software development cycle, including deployment, implementation, and usage is only as strong as its weakest chain. It should take a holistic view of how it’ll be executed, including logical access controls, architectural considerations, and business use. A commonly ignored side of security is the relationship between logical and physical security. Regardless of your effort on implementing a secured process, a physical protection failure can cause a disaster. The best possible solution to such branches is encryption.

Myth 3 – Scanning only the Code is Important

Programmatic scanners offer a reasonable level of promise that software was developed without structural problems, but it’s only one part of the process. It may not figure out some logical source code errors, like race conditions or data validation. Though it scans logical code errors, the company should depend on humans to update new vectors as the warning ground develops. Moreover, some extra group of reviewers, like auditors, testers, and analysts can help in reducing the threat for each new application.

Myth 4 – It All Depends Only Upon the Developers

When any problem occurs, developers are often considered solely responsible; it is true that the primary creators of the software are the developers, but other team members, such as architects, management staff members, analysts, auditors, and testers are also equally responsible too. A team approach will enhance the software change, release, configuration, and improving its standards along with strengthening strategies and reducing the attack surface.

Myth 5 – Educating the Staff Once Is End of the Pain

All of the teams involved in the software security process must hold some degree of experience and if they don’t possess enough knowledge in identifying possible security problems, they should be trained or educated about the entire SDLC process.

To accomplish this, create an industry-recognized certification program to explore the current key aspects of software development. It is important to remember that it’s not just about developing a perfect software program, but controlling the possible risks or vulnerabilities associated with it is an ever-evolving process.